<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source can be anything but free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neildixon.com/238/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neildixon.com/238/</link>
	<description>neil dixon's blog, journal, and list of stuff he does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 03:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Davey Butler</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/archives/2006/04/21/238/#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>I have heard it said that it&#039;s easier to die on stage than to make people laugh. This is probably true but doesn&#039;t really explain the actual feeling when up there. I&#039;d take the laughter anytime.

However, having been on the recieving end of a couple of &#039;deaths&#039; from audiences, it&#039;s never as bad as one imagines. Life goes on and you learn from the experience. You learn because you never want it to happen again.

Unfortunately (or fortunately), in stand-up there&#039;s no easy route. Everyone dies and it can happen at anytime - I guess that&#039;s what makes it such fun!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard it said that it&#8217;s easier to die on stage than to make people laugh. This is probably true but doesn&#8217;t really explain the actual feeling when up there. I&#8217;d take the laughter anytime.</p>
<p>However, having been on the recieving end of a couple of &#8216;deaths&#8217; from audiences, it&#8217;s never as bad as one imagines. Life goes on and you learn from the experience. You learn because you never want it to happen again.</p>
<p>Unfortunately (or fortunately), in stand-up there&#8217;s no easy route. Everyone dies and it can happen at anytime &#8211; I guess that&#8217;s what makes it such fun!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-2103</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/archives/2006/04/21/238/#comment-2103</guid>
		<description>The very thought scares the bejesus out of most people, but it&#039;s really not that bad... honest... &lt;i&gt;[twitch]&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very thought scares the bejesus out of most people, but it&#8217;s really not that bad&#8230; honest&#8230; <i>[twitch]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginny</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/archives/2006/04/21/238/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed the post. You definitely are a brave guy. I could never get up in front of an audience, even if my success was somehow magically guaranteed. I&#039;m such a chicken.

Loved the opening--my first thought was--did he want you to pick up any random dwarf you saw on the way, or did he have a particular one in mind:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed the post. You definitely are a brave guy. I could never get up in front of an audience, even if my success was somehow magically guaranteed. I&#8217;m such a chicken.</p>
<p>Loved the opening&#8211;my first thought was&#8211;did he want you to pick up any random dwarf you saw on the way, or did he have a particular one in mind:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul nicholls - podcastpaul</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>paul nicholls - podcastpaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/archives/2006/04/21/238/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Struth Neil, I&#039;m pinching myself.

As crap technically as I am, I actually understood what you meant!

For a rank amateur like me, open source stuff is great - but I can fast see limitations in stuff. Audacity is perhaps the best example I can think of - a great idea, good application, but ever so limited in many ways.

Right off to do some work now.

;-)

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Struth Neil, I&#8217;m pinching myself.</p>
<p>As crap technically as I am, I actually understood what you meant!</p>
<p>For a rank amateur like me, open source stuff is great &#8211; but I can fast see limitations in stuff. Audacity is perhaps the best example I can think of &#8211; a great idea, good application, but ever so limited in many ways.</p>
<p>Right off to do some work now.<br />
 <img src='http://neildixon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/archives/2006/04/21/238/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Poorly managed proprietary applications can indeed fall into the same issues, but at least there is some commercial motivation to keep things running on track (mostly). I&#039;m increasingly finding client perceptions of open source are based on the perceived higher cost of bespoke solutions. There is often a fixation with the &#039;free&#039; open source solution despite it usually requiring significant work to hack it to their specific requirements - unless it is particularly niche such as Wordpress for Blogs.

In the end it&#039;s all down to the right solution for the right job - sometimes, as in the intranet application I am completing, Drupal is most certainly the right open source solution. The problem comes when trying to demonstrate to a client that your bespoke solution is the most appropriate over OS, it&#039;s the perception of value they have a problem with and immediately assume your intent to move them away from an OS solution is based on you wanting higher returns.

These days I am starting to quote based on providing the solution to their requirement, as opposed to a more traditional multiple option &#039;this will be this much, that will be that much&#039; approach. When clients refocus on the value they get for the price rather than a supermarket pick-and-mix mentality, it actually simplifies the whole sales process and frees the developer from being forced down a route based on the client&#039;s misconceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poorly managed proprietary applications can indeed fall into the same issues, but at least there is some commercial motivation to keep things running on track (mostly). I&#8217;m increasingly finding client perceptions of open source are based on the perceived higher cost of bespoke solutions. There is often a fixation with the &#8216;free&#8217; open source solution despite it usually requiring significant work to hack it to their specific requirements &#8211; unless it is particularly niche such as WordPress for Blogs.</p>
<p>In the end it&#8217;s all down to the right solution for the right job &#8211; sometimes, as in the intranet application I am completing, Drupal is most certainly the right open source solution. The problem comes when trying to demonstrate to a client that your bespoke solution is the most appropriate over OS, it&#8217;s the perception of value they have a problem with and immediately assume your intent to move them away from an OS solution is based on you wanting higher returns.</p>
<p>These days I am starting to quote based on providing the solution to their requirement, as opposed to a more traditional multiple option &#8216;this will be this much, that will be that much&#8217; approach. When clients refocus on the value they get for the price rather than a supermarket pick-and-mix mentality, it actually simplifies the whole sales process and frees the developer from being forced down a route based on the client&#8217;s misconceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Emerson</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/archives/2006/04/21/238/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Is that really a problem of open source specifically? Isn&#039;t it more the question of whether it&#039;s appropriate to use something pre-built (open source or proprietary) or whether you&#039;d be better off creating your own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that really a problem of open source specifically? Isn&#8217;t it more the question of whether it&#8217;s appropriate to use something pre-built (open source or proprietary) or whether you&#8217;d be better off creating your own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
