<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On writing style and the troubling flourish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neildixon.com/on-writing-style-and-the-troubling-flourish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neildixon.com/on-writing-style-and-the-troubling-flourish/</link>
	<description>neil dixon's blog, journal, and list of stuff he does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Parrot (Edward G. Talbot)</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/on-writing-style-and-the-troubling-flourish/comment-page-1/#comment-77367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Parrot (Edward G. Talbot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/2008/06/10/on-writing-style-and-the-troubling-flourish/#comment-77367</guid>
		<description>HI Neil - 

  I know exactly what you are talking about.  After completing my thriller, I started writing a humorous murder mystery.  Just a totally different style required.  And now I am working on both that and another thriller with my co-author, so that makes it even more challenging.  My method of getting the words out is fairly mechanical (although I hope my style isn&#039;t) so what works for me to switch styles is writing a little bit of garbage in a style the opposite of the tendency I want to avoid.  Which isn&#039;t necessarily the same as the style I am shooting for, it&#039;s more like a palate cleanser for what I am trying to shake.  For instance, if you are trying to shorten your sentences, try to write a paragraph that flows and holds together but where no sentence is longer than 7 words.  Maybe no verbs in some sentences.  If you read the first chapter of Lee Child&#039;s &quot;The Killing Floor&quot; you&#039;ll see a perfect example of the opposite of the Victorian style that you could try to imitate to clear things out.  Just one random thought on this.

Cheers,

Ed Parrot
co-author of the podcast novel, New World Orders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Neil &#8211; </p>
<p>  I know exactly what you are talking about.  After completing my thriller, I started writing a humorous murder mystery.  Just a totally different style required.  And now I am working on both that and another thriller with my co-author, so that makes it even more challenging.  My method of getting the words out is fairly mechanical (although I hope my style isn&#8217;t) so what works for me to switch styles is writing a little bit of garbage in a style the opposite of the tendency I want to avoid.  Which isn&#8217;t necessarily the same as the style I am shooting for, it&#8217;s more like a palate cleanser for what I am trying to shake.  For instance, if you are trying to shorten your sentences, try to write a paragraph that flows and holds together but where no sentence is longer than 7 words.  Maybe no verbs in some sentences.  If you read the first chapter of Lee Child&#8217;s &#8220;The Killing Floor&#8221; you&#8217;ll see a perfect example of the opposite of the Victorian style that you could try to imitate to clear things out.  Just one random thought on this.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Ed Parrot<br />
co-author of the podcast novel, New World Orders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
