<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neildixon.com/project-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neildixon.com/project-overload/</link>
	<description>neil dixon's blog, journal, and list of stuff he does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/project-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-77729</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=871#comment-77729</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan. Looking through how it does things and how tasks and projects are organised, it&#039;s not for me I&#039;m afraid. One of the failings of most GTD &quot;solutions&quot; - particularly those used via a web browser, interestingly - is they break the fundamental necessity of getting things done: keep it simple. Tools like this invariably introduce layers of complexity that are unnecessary to the core process and that lead inevitably to spending more time working with the GTD solution than actually getting things done. Just my experience, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan. Looking through how it does things and how tasks and projects are organised, it&#8217;s not for me I&#8217;m afraid. One of the failings of most GTD &#8220;solutions&#8221; &#8211; particularly those used via a web browser, interestingly &#8211; is they break the fundamental necessity of getting things done: keep it simple. Tools like this invariably introduce layers of complexity that are unnecessary to the core process and that lead inevitably to spending more time working with the GTD solution than actually getting things done. Just my experience, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/project-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-77625</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=871#comment-77625</guid>
		<description>For implementing GTD you might try out this web-based application:

http://www.gtdagenda.com

You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, schedules and a calendar.
A mobile version is available too.

As with the last update, now you can add or invite Contacts, and share your Projects and Contexts with them.

Hope you like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For implementing GTD you might try out this web-based application:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gtdagenda.com" >http://www.gtdagenda.com</a></p>
<p>You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, schedules and a calendar.<br />
A mobile version is available too.</p>
<p>As with the last update, now you can add or invite Contacts, and share your Projects and Contexts with them.</p>
<p>Hope you like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
