<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a minor technicality &#187; dialogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neildixon.com/tag/dialogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neildixon.com</link>
	<description>neil dixon's blog, journal, and list of stuff he does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Process, process, and more writing process</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/process-process-and-more-writing-process/</link>
		<comments>http://neildixon.com/process-process-and-more-writing-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mobileNeil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiobook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moleskine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrivener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a fair amount of discussion in this household this week about our personal processes in writing. Novels do not write themselves, and are a vast undertaking. So how would you get from scribbled inspiration to 100,000 words worthy of someone taking the time to read?
How you would achieve this, I have no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>There has been a fair amount of discussion in this household this week about our personal processes in writing. Novels do not write themselves, and are a vast undertaking. So how would you get from scribbled inspiration to 100,000 words worthy of someone taking the time to read?</h3>
<p>How <em>you</em> would achieve this, I have no idea. How I am &#8211; well on the way to &#8211; achieving this is what this post is about. Some of this may work for you, or not. ---- All rights reserved. nd.com Read on... </p>
<h4>The first draft is crap &#8211; deal with it</h4>
<p>That reality was one of the toughest ideas to overcome &#8211; understanding that it is just fine to write a first draft that you would only consider using as lavatory paper (and then only in secret just in case anyone gets even a glimpse of the text). No one will read the first draft. With my first draft, not even me! I&#8217;ll get to why in just a moment, but first another important step: I stopped editing.</p>
<p>Once I came to terms with the prospect of writing rubbish I began to be far more productive, but very soon fell back into the pit of over eager editing and the resulting snail&#8217;s pace in progress because I was editing too much too early.</p>
<h4>A pen and a Moleskine</h4>
<p>I learned writing by hand prevented editing beyond a scribbled-out paragraph or two and a scrawled note in some nearby free space. I calculated that my handwriting would squeeze around 90,000 words into a standard Moleskine lined notebook (spend money on a decent quality notebook so you are less inclined to actually use it as toilet paper later).</p>
<p>This process brought me to a first draft in a couple of months. The pages filled, the story unfolded, and I found myself rapidly heading to the start of the second draft.</p>
<p>I kept the pace of the writing moving forward as consistently as possible. When something blocked that momentum or where some scene or action could not be worked through at that point, I simply wrote &#8220;stuff happens here to get them to the station&#8221; or similar. Can&#8217;t deal with it now? Then move on and deal with it later &#8211; you&#8217;re going to have to re-write it all anyway!</p>
<h4>Engagement</h4>
<p>Writing by hand seemed to have the additional benefit of embedding the text deeper into memory, to the extent that, while writing the second draft, I rarely have to reference the notebook. This is good because I do not have the neatest handwriting, particularly when ideas are in full flow.</p>
<h4>More of the right tools</h4>
<p>The second draft had to be transferred into some electronic form. Having as much love for Microsoft Word as a Marmite encrusted stick of celery, it took some time and exploration to discover <a href="http://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.html">Scrivener</a>. This tool does what I need it to, doesn&#8217;t try to teach me how to write, doesn&#8217;t get in the way when I want to write, and has just the right level of organisation and customisability to tailor it to my needs, while ensuring I do not lose endless hours messing with too many needless settings. It&#8217;s not perfect, but it&#8217;s just right for me.</p>
<p>I do not use post-its or cards stuck to cork boards to play with the story, but I frequently use my large whiteboard for brainstorming plot points and working through the odd character crisis. Whiteboards are essential.</p>
<h4>The serialised audiobook</h4>
<p>Now this stage is likely not for everyone, but starting early 2008 I committed myself to releasing the second draft of the novel as a weekly 20 minute audio book. This established a predictable regime of writing around 3,500 words per week and structuring the work to ensure the story is continually developing in order to keep the audience&#8217;s attention. It means not only I am imposing a deadline, but so are those who email me in anticipation of the next episode.</p>
<p>The process also forced me to read the text aloud, frequently bringing to light issues with the text, grammar errors, plot problems, and particularly highlighting poor dialogue, which could be immediately fixed. Being the second draft, the audio version is not perfect by any means, but the benefits of this part of my process far outweighs concerns over an uncorrected error here and there.</p>
<p>Vacations, sickness and work trips aside, this has kept me on track. It is not without its stress, of course, as I am adding several hours each week in recording, editing, mixing and publishing the audio files, plus online promotion and building an audience. I currently have well over 90,000 words under my belt. Without this self imposed routine, I am convinced this book would not be as far along as it is right now.</p>
<h4>What&#8217;s next?</h4>
<p>A third draft will be necessary, as will having a trusted friend or two reading the text and providing constructive criticism. The text must be edited to improve pace and flow in some areas, of that I am already aware. And certain (and irritating to me) aspects of my natural and imperfect writing style have to be polished.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot more work to be done and since that is in the future I do not feel able to discuss a process that I have not yet personally applied &#8211; so more on this subject in other posts.</p>
<p>I am looking forward to starting on the second book in the series, with the knowledge and experience of the first behind me. I may find a slightly different process, or an identical one. Processes are always subject to change, but one thing of which I am absolutely certain is that its first draft will be hand written in a spanking new Moleskine.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fneildixon.com%2Fprocess-process-and-more-writing-process%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Process%2C+process%2C+and+more+writing+process';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
<img src="http://neildixon.com/8cb2f934/266bbf73/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />
	Tags: <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/audience/" title="audience" rel="tag nofollow">audience</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/audiobook/" title="audiobook" rel="tag nofollow">audiobook</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/dialogue/" title="dialogue" rel="tag nofollow">dialogue</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/inspiration/" title="Inspiration" rel="tag nofollow">Inspiration</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/moleskine/" title="Moleskine" rel="tag nofollow">Moleskine</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/process/" title="process" rel="tag nofollow">process</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/scrivener/" title="scrivener" rel="tag nofollow">scrivener</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/story/" title="story" rel="tag nofollow">story</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/writing/" title="Writing" rel="tag nofollow">Writing</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/it-goes-clonk/" title="It goes clonk (December 19, 2009)">It goes clonk</a> (1)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/an-agent-in-the-middle/" title="An agent in the middle (October 22, 2009)">An agent in the middle</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/it%e2%80%99s-that-nanowrimo-time-again/" title="It’s that NaNoWriMo time again (October 11, 2009)">It’s that NaNoWriMo time again</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/it-has-been-quiet/" title="It has been quiet (August 18, 2009)">It has been quiet</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/persistent-spirit-chapter-36/" title="Persistent Spirit Chapter 36 (August 9, 2009)">Persistent Spirit Chapter 36</a> (2)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neildixon.com/process-process-and-more-writing-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s only for the X-philes</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/its-only-for-the-x-philes/</link>
		<comments>http://neildixon.com/its-only-for-the-x-philes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mobileNeil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite concerns of dozing off with jet-lag gnawing at my heels, I went to see the new X-files movie with a positive and hopeful frame of mind.
The movie, just as with the first installment, has been criticized as being little more than a long TV episode. Really, I thought, what else can you expect from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Despite concerns of dozing off with jet-lag gnawing at my heels, I went to see the new X-files movie with a positive and hopeful frame of mind.</h3>
<p>The movie, just as with the first installment, has been criticized as being little more than a long TV episode. Really, I thought, what else can you expect from a movie version of a TV series? ---- All rights reserved. nd.com Read on... </p>
<p><em>I Want To Believe</em> is not merely <em>like</em> a TV episode, it <em>is</em> a TV episode. Here&#8217;s how to make it: take a standard TV episode length plot (and not a particularly great one at that) and forcibly inject an irrelevant sub-plot &#8211; that smacks of a very personal moral agenda and creates an imbalance between the two main characters&#8217; individual conflicts &#8211; and you might have something long enough to be classed a feature film (it just will not be a very good one).</p>
<p>Flooded with implausible and often confusing leaps in the story &#8211; enough on one occasion for me to believe I had actually dropped off to sleep and missed something critical &#8211; the dialogue is awash with extended, plot-irrelevant conversation while critical information receives the briefest of mentions as though unimportant. And don&#8217;t get me started on  the level of bitterness poured out by Scully (driven by another agenda point, I think). I could spend far too many words about specific issues this plot and script has, but I&#8217;ll not offer any spoilers just in case you are planning to see it.</p>
<p>This film is a missed opportunity to reawaken the slumbering passions of a still dedicated cult audience and I suspect has slaughtered any hope of a third movie. Even if the budget was not up to creating something spectacular, there&#8217;s no excuse for poor storytelling. Loyal fans of the X-Files deserve better.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fneildixon.com%2Fits-only-for-the-x-philes%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'It%26%238217%3Bs+only+for+the+X-philes';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
<img src="http://neildixon.com/8cb2f934/266bbf73/CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html).gif" />
	Tags: <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/dialogue/" title="dialogue" rel="tag nofollow">dialogue</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/movies/" title="Movies" rel="tag nofollow">Movies</a>, <a href="http://neildixon.com/tag/plot/" title="plot" rel="tag nofollow">plot</a><br />

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/process-process-and-more-writing-process/" title="Process, process, and more writing process (August 6, 2008)">Process, process, and more writing process</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/minor-technicality-episode-40/" title="Minor Technicality #40 &#8211; Chatting to an idol (June 1, 2008)">Minor Technicality #40 &#8211; Chatting to an idol</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/sometimes-you-need-to-walk-away/" title="Sometimes you need to walk away (April 4, 2008)">Sometimes you need to walk away</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/nokia-n810-for-sale-cheaper-than-amazon/" title="Nokia N810 for sale cheaper than Amazon (January 19, 2008)">Nokia N810 for sale cheaper than Amazon</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://neildixon.com/we-can-only-have-so-much-americana/" title="We can only have so much Americana (January 3, 2008)">We can only have so much Americana</a> (7)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://neildixon.com/its-only-for-the-x-philes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
