<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s nofollow, so do we need noarrive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neildixon.com/theres-nofollow-so-do-we-need-noarrive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neildixon.com/theres-nofollow-so-do-we-need-noarrive/</link>
	<description>neil dixon's blog, journal, and list of stuff he does</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/theres-nofollow-so-do-we-need-noarrive/comment-page-1/#comment-78022</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=868#comment-78022</guid>
		<description>The site that scraped your content was relatively small and disappeared quite quickly (good to see Blogger responding to the reported issues promptly), so I think the impact was negligible. Most potentially damaging in your case might have been having duplicate content in two locations, but Google are now very good at determining the originating source of content, so you would likely not get penalised. If the amount of traffic you get from organic searches has not reduced, then there&#039;s nothing to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site that scraped your content was relatively small and disappeared quite quickly (good to see Blogger responding to the reported issues promptly), so I think the impact was negligible. Most potentially damaging in your case might have been having duplicate content in two locations, but Google are now very good at determining the originating source of content, so you would likely not get penalised. If the amount of traffic you get from organic searches has not reduced, then there&#8217;s nothing to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jEN</title>
		<link>http://neildixon.com/theres-nofollow-so-do-we-need-noarrive/comment-page-1/#comment-78010</link>
		<dc:creator>jEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neildixon.com/?p=868#comment-78010</guid>
		<description>As a victim of scrapers myself, I wonder about what kind of damage the splogs have created for my site. In this case, there certainly is such a thing as &#039;bad press&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a victim of scrapers myself, I wonder about what kind of damage the splogs have created for my site. In this case, there certainly is such a thing as &#8216;bad press&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
